The writing is inseparable from the becoming; writing, it becomes-woman, becomes-animal or vegetable, becomes-molecule to becoming-imperceptible. The evolution does not work the other way, and no man becomes, while the man is presented as a dominant form of expression intended to be imposed on any matter, while women, animal or molecule always contain a component of leakage that subtracted from its own conclusion. The shame of being a man, is there any better reason to write? Even when a woman who becomes, it has a becoming-woman, and this evolution has nothing to do with a state she could claim. Becoming no is to achieve a form (identification, imitation, Mimesis), but to find the neighborhood of indiscernibility or differentiation that no longer fit unamujer distinguished from unanimal or unamolécula: not vague or general, but unforeseen, no pre-existing the less certain in a way as to single out in a population.
0 comments:
Post a Comment