Back Leg Twitch In Dogs

Things between things

We plant trees on their heads: the life, knowledge, etc. Everyone claims roots. Power is always tree. Almost all disciplines go through schemes arborescence: biology, computer science, linguistics (the controllers or systems centered). The tree is not a metaphor, is a device that is planted in the mind, an operation to make him go in the right direction, that of the right ideas. In the tree there are all sorts of characters there is a point of origin, origin or center, is a binary machine or principle of dichotomy with its branches spread and reproduced in perpetuity, their points of arborescence, axis of rotation organized around the center circle and things in circles, it's structure, hierarchical system of transmission of orders, with central and memory recapitulated instance, there is a future past, a root and a drink, a history, an evolution, development or development time. But there are multitudes that continue to overwhelm the machinery binary and who refuse to divorce. Haycentros everywhere as black holes which can not be agglomerated. Lines that have nothing to do with the trajectory of a point and that escape from the structure. Drain lines, transformations, becomings no future and no past, no memory. No parallel developments do not proceed by differentiation, but that jump from one line to another human to completely heterogeneous. This is the Rhizome . Thinking about things between things that is making rhizome and root not, draw the line and not stop to recapitulate. Create a desert population and gender rather than species in a forest.

Fake Id London Ontario

Jean Dubuffet, Jean Dubuffet

virtual Surge (1963)

Oil on canvas. 220 x 190 cm.

Location: Centre Georges Pompidou. Paris

Garden Company Slogans

virtual (1901-1985) writing

Four trees

1972 (71 years)

Material: polyurethane epoxy paint.

Size: 12 m.

Museum: Chase Manhattan Plaza. New York

English To Tamil Poetry

Becoming Becoming

The writing is inseparable from the becoming; writing, it becomes-woman, becomes-animal or vegetable, becomes-molecule to becoming-imperceptible. The evolution does not work the other way, and no man becomes, while the man is presented as a dominant form of expression intended to be imposed on any matter, while women, animal or molecule always contain a component of leakage that subtracted from its own conclusion. The shame of being a man, is there any better reason to write? Even when a woman who becomes, it has a becoming-woman, and this evolution has nothing to do with a state she could claim. Becoming no is to achieve a form (identification, imitation, Mimesis), but to find the neighborhood of indiscernibility or differentiation that no longer fit unamujer distinguished from unanimal or unamolécula: not vague or general, but unforeseen, no pre-existing the less certain in a way as to single out in a population.

What Does A Ohio License Look Like

Bartleby

The next morning arrived.

"Bartleby," I said, politely calling.

Silence.

"Bartleby," I said even softer tone, "come, I will not be asked to do anything that you would prefer not to do. I just want to talk to you.

With this, I went quietly.

- Will you tell me, Bartleby, where was he born?

"I'd rather not.

- Want to tell me something about you?

"I'd rather not.,

- But what reasonable objection can be to not talk to me? I wanted to be a friend.

As I spoke, I looked. His eyes were fixed on the bust of Cicero, who was right behind me, about six inches above my head.

- What is your answer, Bartleby? I asked, after a long wait, during which his attitude was static, being noticed only the slightest tremor in his lips faded.

"For now I'd rather not answer, he said, and retired to his hermitage.

Maybe I was weak, I admit, but his attitude irritated me this time.

the book Bartleby the Scrivener by Herman Melville

Wicker Chair For Baby Shower

Deleuze Foucault says goodbye to his friend machinic

video posted 29/06/1984 in immanence

Burton Light Camo Jackets

Addicts (Felix Guattari)

"The addicting"

Felix Guattari * Translation: Carlos Enrique Restrepo

would

to start from a broad definition of the drug addictions, to me, are all mechanisms of subjectivity production "machine", everything that helps provide a sense of belonging, of being somewhere, and also feeling forgotten. The existential aspects of what I call the machinic drug experiences are not easily detectable, only perceive its surface visible through practices such as skiing, ultralight flights, rock, video clips, all this sort of thing. But the subjective scope of these addictions is not necessarily related to the practice in question ... is the entire performance of what interests

sa. The example of Japan, considered a large scale, is significant. The Japanese are in line with an archaic structure, say rather, pseudo-archaic. This is the counterpart of their addictions machine so that society will not shred ... They restructured from a territorial feudal tradition, perpetuating the alienated condition of women, engaging in repetitive

between machines ... These are also behaviors to subjective position, or end, not quite "for", but the result is this: it works! The Japanese structure their universe, order their affections on the proliferation and clutter of machines, clinging to archaic references. But, above all, are crazy about machines, machinic addiction. Did you know, for example, that half the people who climb the Himalayas are Japanese?

Addiction. Drugs. And is it a simple analogy? It seems that, according to recent research, is not entirely a metaphor. Repeated pains, some activities enough "grip," encourage the brain to secrete hormones, endorphins, drugs much "harder" than morphine. Perhaps by this means do not reach an auto-intoxication? In

The Edge, I noticed how anorexics look like drug addicts. The same bad faith, the same way to take one promising to stop hair ... Anorexia is an addiction more. Also sadomasochism. And any other unique passion that causes endorphin downloads. One is "drug" with the stridency of the rock, with fatigue, with lack of sleep, like Kafka, or banging his head against the ground, as autistic children. In the excitement, cold, repetitive movements, forced labor, the sports effort fear. Ski down a vertical slope, effectively transforms the data of personality! U

Na

way produced, to incarnate person, while the existential background of the picture remains unclear. I repeat, the result of addiction and its social representation are likely to be totally displaced. Addiction sets in motion processes that radically beyond consciousness, the individual, produces biological changes which the individual experiences a confused-but-intense way your need. The "machine-drug" Ecstasy can trigger the collective, the gregariousness oppressive, not because it is less a response to an individual drive. The same thing happens with addictions under The person who returns home shattered, exhausted after a grueling day

, and mechanically pressing the control on your TV. This is another personal reterritorialization through entirely artificial means. These phenomena of contemporary addiction seem therefore ambiguous. There are two entrances: repetition, Birdbrain, as in the case of monomania of intoxication flippers1 or video games. And the intervention of the process "machine", that is not trivial and never naive. There is a machinic Eros. Yes, young Japanese, saturated commit suicide after school, yes, thousands of men, from 6:00 am, repeated in chorus movements golf on a cement parking lot, yes, young workers sleeping in halls and give up their holidays ... Stooges by machines! But nevertheless, there are in Japan a kind of democracy of desire, even in the company.

A kind of balance. "Because of the addiction? Between us, addictions machinic work more in the sense of a return to the individual, but nevertheless seem subjective essential for stabilization of industrial societies, especially in times of increased competitiveness. If you do not have at least this compensation, no nothing! Is taken ... The molecular machinic subjectivity can be creative, no matter what domain. Young Italians believe it rather politically disorganized after the collapse of the protest movements, do nothing! Arrange each one as you can! A society that was not able to tolerate, manage their addictions lose its force. Would be crushed. We need to articulate it, like it or not, the apparent disorder of l

as addictions, even and especially those that give the impression of being unproductive loopholes. The Americans are the champions of the addictions have thousands, invented every day. And I do very well. The Russians, however, but have no Bolshevism old addiction ... subjectivity is "machine" that generates great momentum as Silicon Valley. And in France? French society is not irretrievably lost. The French are not more stupid than others, no more poor libido. But they are not "fashionable." Social superstructures are, so to speak, rather molars. There is hardly with us institutions that give space to the processes of proliferation "machine." France, it is repeated ad nauseum, is the tradition, the Mediterranean, the immortal principles of this or that. And the moment that the planet is being crossed by mutations fantastic, we see a dim large addictions "machines." Universal explosion is "out." Will the Olympics? And the Pompidou Centre, which at first had its grace, is stuck with successive exposures and relatively permanent parasites. In summary, the anti-addiction. Is it intended Japanize to France by sending delegations to Tokyo? That's really funny ... Outside the endorphin! It seems that France has not had a good start. Neither Europe. Processes "engineer" may require large spaces, a large market or a large real power, as in antiquity. And / or also, as suggested by Braudel semiological media concentration, monetary, intellectual, a knowledge capital. New York, Chicago, California with all America behind. Or Amsterdam in the seventeenth century. That alone would enable viable entities. The megamachines! This addiction is for the club more or less private, no more than a escampadero. Subjectivizes people are remakes existential territories with their addictions. But the complementarity between the machines and this kind of escampaderos is not guaranteed! If addiction fails, if it fails, no implosion. There is a critical threshold. Failure leads to a social project in a large Japanese company in the American mobility, perish. For example, Van Gogh, Artaud. The process "machine" which could not leave destroyed. What true addicts! My existence dragged into a process of singling? Perfect! But if you stop, ready, finally, the catastrophe is imminent. Lack of prospects, a micro output. There must exist "in" the process. Empty repetition of addiction, that's terrible! When you realize that, when you end up say, "it was nothing ...." The counterculture of the sixties, the Third World, Marxism-Leninism, rock: there are many addictions that have done more damage when became obsolete ... It is regrettable or sinking, or the creation of unusual worlds. Thoroughly subjective formations worked by addictions can revive the movement, or on the contrary, it slowly extinguished. Behind all this, there are possibilities of creation, transformation of life, of scientific revolutions, economic and even aesthetic. New horizons, or nothing. I do not think here in the old ballads on spontaneity as a factor in creation. Absurd! But in the vast enterprise of stratification, serialization that oppresses our societies, in which lurk subjective formations suitable for the power to re-launch the process and to promote the kingdom of the unique mutant of new minorities. Visible sectors of addiction should not be conquered territories defenses, the residual crystals are machinic addiction may cross the entire planet, revive, re-launch. A society pinched to the point will have to deal with this, or perish.

* 1984 - "Les Défonce machiniques." Conversations collected by Jean-Fancis Held, Les nouvelles, between 12 and 18 April 1984.

1 Name with which you know some pinball machines in Germany and France [N. T.].

_______

Source: http://www.revistaeuphorion.org/numeros/numeros/articulos/numero5/adictos.html

3d Butterfly Invitations

Gilles Reading Nietzsche: God From the desire

The speculative assumptions come into play the idea of \u200b\u200bGod from the point of view form. God does not exist, or exists, while his idea involves or does not involve contradiction. But the formula "God is dead" is of another nature: does the existence of God depend on a synthesis operates the synthesis of the idea of \u200b\u200bGod over time, with the future, history, man. Simultaneously says: God has existed and died and rose again, God has made man and man has become God. The phrase 'God is dead "is not a speculative proposition, but a dramatic proposal, the proposal for dramatic excellence. God can not be done in order to incorporate a synthetic knowledge without death. The existence or nonexistence determinations are no longer relevant to the forces that come into synthesis with the idea of \u200b\u200bGod or the idea of \u200b\u200bGod. The dramatic proposition is synthetic, then, essentially pluralist typology and differential. Who dies and who kills God? "When the gods die, always die with various kinds of deaths." 1 ° From the point of view of negative nihilism: when Jewish and Christian knowledge. The idea of \u200b\u200bGod expresses the will to nothingness, the depreciation of life "when it is placed center of gravity of life in life, but beyond, into nothingness, it has been taken from the center of life of gravity. But the depreciation, the hatred of life as a whole, represents a glorification of life in particular reactive: they, the bad, sinners ... us good. The principle and consequence. Jewish consciousness or awareness of resentment (after the beautiful time of the kings of Israel) has these two aspects are in a relation of premises and conclusion, in principle, and therefore, this love is the result of this hatred. We must do the will of nothing more seductive the opposing one to the other, making love the antithesis of hate. The Jewish God kills his son to make it independent of himself and the Jewish people: this is the first sense of the death of God. Neither Saturn had this subtlety in their movements. Jewish consciousness kills God in the person of the Son. Invent a God of love who would suffer hate, instead of finding their premises and principle. Jewish consciousness makes God, in His Son, independent Jewish premises. By killing God has found ways to make your God a universal God "for all" and truly cosmopolitan. The Christian God, then, the Jewish God, but made cosmopolitan, a conclusion separated from their premises. On the cross, God no longer appears as a Jew. Similarly, on the cross, the old God dies and is born the new God. Born orphan and become a father again in his own image: God of love, but love is still the life of the strip. Here is the second sense of the death of God, the Father dies, the Son makes us do a god. The Son only asks us to believe in him, love him as he loves us, become reactive to avoid hatred. Instead of a father who gave us fear, a child asking a little confidence, a bit of belief. Apparently detached from its premises hateful, love of life reactive to fend for itself and become universal to the Christian conscience. Third sense of the death of God: Paul takes over this death, it gives an interpretation that is Christianity. The Gospels were those who started, Paul brings to perfection a great fake. First, Christ died for our sins! The operator would have offered his own son, he would have paid with their own child, so great was the debt of the debtor. The father and not kill your child to do independently, but for us, for our cause. God takes his son to the cross for love, we will respond to this love whenever we feel guilty, guilty of his death and that fix it for accusing us, paying the interest on the debt. Under the love of God, under the sacrifice his son, all life becomes reactive. Life dies but is reborn as reactive. Reactive life is the content of survival as such, the contents of the resurrection. Only she is chosen by God, only she has grace before God and the will to nothingness. The Crucified God raises: This is another counterfeiting of St. Paul, the resurrection of Christ and our survival, the unity of love and life strip. No longer is the father who kills the hiio, and not the son who kills the father, the father dies in the child, the child is raised in the father, for us, for our cause. "Basically Paul could not use in any way the Savior's life, death needed on the cross, and something even more ...»: resurrection. In the Christian conscience, not only hidden resentment, but it changes direction: the Jewish consciousness was aware of the resentment, the Christian conscience is bad conscience. Christian conscience is inverted Jewish consciousness: love life, but as a reactive life, has become the universal love has become in principle, always lively hatred appears only as a consequence of this love, the environment against what resists that love. Warrior Jesus, Jesus full of hate, but love. 2. º From the viewpoint of reactive nihilism: when the European consciousness. So far the death of God means synthesis in the idea of \u200b\u200bGod's will to nothingness and life strip. This synthesis has different proportions. But to the extent that life becomes reactive in essence, Christianity leads to a strange start. We said that we who we killed God. This secretes its own atheism, atheism bad conscience and resentment. Life reactive rather than divine, Man reagent in place of God, the Man-God and the God-man, Western man. The man has killed God, but who has killed God? The reactive man as "the most horrible man." The divine will, the will to nothingness no longer tolerate life than reactive; it no longer tolerates no God, he hates God's mercy, to take literally what the sacrifice, drown in the trap of his mercy. Prevents you from resurrecting, sits on the lid. Instead of correlation between the divine and the reactive life, displacement, replacement of God by man reagent. Here is the fourth sense of the death of God: God is love asphyxiation reactive life, God has been drowned out by the ungrateful who loves too much. 3. º From the point of view of passive nihilism: when Buddhist consciousness. If we leave aside the fakes that start with the Gospels and found its final form in San Pablo, what's left of Christ, what is its personal nature, which the meaning of death? Should illuminate what Nietzsche calls "the contradiction of the Gospel." What the texts leave us guessing the true Christ, the joyful message that brought the abolition of the idea of \u200b\u200bsin, the absence of any resentment or any spirit of revenge, rejection of any war even as a result, the revelation of a kingdom of God here below as a condition of the heart, and especially the acceptance of death as proof of their doctrine. We realize where they're going to stop Nietzsche: Christ was the opposite of what they made him Paul, the true Christ was a kind of Buddha, "a little Buddha on Indian land." It was too advanced for its time, to their environment: teaching and reactive to life to die peacefully, to go out quietly, showing his true reactive output to life when she was still struggling against the will of power. Hedonism offered a reactive life, a nobility to the last man, when men were still wondering whether or not occupy the place of God. Nobility provided a passive nihilism, when men were still in negative nihilism, when I started just reactive nihilism. Beyond the bad conscience and resentment, Jesus gave a lesson to the reactive man teaches you to die. He was the decadent sweetest, the most interesting. Christ was neither Jew nor Christian, but Buddhist closest to the Dalai Lama to the Pope. As advance towards their country, their means, that his death had to be distorted, falsified their history, back, in the service of previous states, diverted for the benefit of nihilism reactive or negative. "Twisted and converted by St. Paul in a doctrine of pagan mysteries which eventually reconciled with any political organization ... and learn to make war, to condemn, torture, judge, to hate 'hatred become through Christ that so sweet. Because the difference between Buddhism and Christianity officer Paul is this: Buddhism is the religion of passive nihilism, "Buddhism is a religion for the purpose and tired of civilization, Christianity is not even with this civilization, but created if necessary." The peculiarity of the Christian and European history is done, with iron and fire, an end, on the other hand, there already and has naturally been reached: the conclusion of nihilism. What Buddhism had come to live as so conducted, as achieved perfection, Christianity it lives only as a motor. It is not excluded that gets this end, it is not impossible that Christianity would lead to a "practice" stripped of all Pabloite mythology, is not excluded you find the actual practice of Christ. "Buddhism quietly progresses throughout Europe." But how much hatred and how many wars to get here. Christ personally had installed in the latter end, he had met on a flight, bird of Buddha in a medium that was not Buddhist. In contrast, for this purpose is also that of Christianity, it has to go back through all states of nihilism, the output of a long and terrible policy of revenge.

previous reading: Analysis of piety
Next reading: Anti-Hegelianism

Painting: Francis Bacon.

Study after Velásquez's Portrait of Pope Innocent X. 153 × 118 cm .1953

Official Pokemon Sugimori Art

For me, I would not imply any fault, nor is a natural, is linked to a provision of heterogeneous works, is a process, as opposed to structure or genesis is affected, as opposed to feeling; is haecceidad (individuality of a day, a station in life), as opposed to subjectivity, is an event, as opposed to something or someone. And above all involve the establishment of a field of immanence or a "body without organs," only defined by zones of intensity, thresholds, gradients, flow.

GD

Death Anniversary Invitation Cards

dead virtue of DG

"The virtue of a free man shows so large when avoiding hazards such as when due"

"In a free man, the flight time as firmly that reveals the struggle that is, free men choose the flight with the same presence or firmness of mind that battle. "

B. Spinoza. Ethics, IV.

Euro Steam Iron Model 4488

Via Naxos

Where To Get Fake Ids In London Ontario

Bean teaches the science of flight. By Eduardo Pavlovsky

This is a beautiful text published in Page 12 .

Learning from their own character, "Bean", the author warns about the relationship as "toxic" to "reduce the power of acting" contrary to "good meetings that produce happy feelings." Of those relationships is better flee, because, quoting Bean, "the flight is not a disease but a science."


play in my Bean, the protagonist is a micro-strategist that lets you express to live. He realizes he has to select the relationships in your life: relationships doses, the time spent to make it operational live as they want, allowing you to live with power. The "flight" allows you to design a meaning to his life. Are existential foundations.
had a philosophy of life and developed a series of ideas unintelligible to those around him, that he was perceived as a stranger, as being elusive and unattainable. Some branded him schizophrenic, others from serious phobic. Only a physician close to him began to perceive that his bizarre behavior had a level of intelligibility, and decided to follow it investigate the strange philosophy of life that Beans and turned to the subject of scientific research. Beans
He confided certain phrases that were part of his thought-Decalogue, he said, and that Dr. Guillermo Ballesteros and called the doctor, kept as a relic.

Decalogue
Beans Beans The Decalogue consists of the following 14 formula:
- I have no despair, only daily invention.
- Every morning you have to invent the day.
- Do not kill me because I know I have the amazing freedom to do so at any time (Sentence awarded to the Romanian philosopher Cioran and that he took as their own).
- Life is a huge departure and must be trained every day.
- We must learn to endure not one, not even the parents themselves.
- You have to wonder yourself.
- No need to learn to communicate, but learn to escape in time.
- Life is beautiful only if one learns to select moments.
- Life itself is not interesting only if we can design attractive every day.
- A lot of people sick and poisoning us. It is a science to discover the toxicity in humans.
- Be careful not to get sucked into any face or any theory, the metric is a fundamental science.
- must select the right thing to do to survive.
- The flight is not a disease: it is a true science should be taught from childhood to escape quickly from the idiocy.
- Learn to create bubbles of isolation. Designing these bubbles to always carry hand (Deleuzian concept, which he called himself).
Bean had designed the time he could stand without intoxication in regular conversations with people who crossed daily:
- Goalkeeper: two seconds.
- Your mother: one minute 10 seconds.
- His father: one minute 14 seconds.
- Pedro (casual friend with who was in the Floresta station): 10 seconds and three quarters.
- His uncle Myth: a second.
- Miss Golden (English teacher): 20 minutes.
- Alsace (prostitute who frequented): one hour.
- His girlfriend Serafina: four periods of two minutes with one minute breaks.
The flight time saves us from the crap we endure from others.
Bean had made a trip to Greenland (where he was very happy.) From there he wrote:
"People are here permanently standing barely sit. There are almost no seats in the meetings. Discrete minimal movement and allowed to depart from the others. As a result, people feel more free than having to get up painfully somewhere. The join would be a notification of the intention to move away. They move freely and can, as they are standing away permanently, without much ceremony and go the other way when they please. Nothing is flashy and nobody would feel offended. The advantage of always standing as nobody is offended, they can go to a place where he pleases and without explanation. Fewer patients with resentment and digestive diseases. A world free.
"I lost much time in the chairs, my friend!
"Whoever stands expresses grandeur and independence and who sits expressed weight and durability.
"On the squat, is one that has broken away from men, not imposed on anyone, rests in itself.
"A big hug to everyone. I stay here indefinitely.
"PS: Many things will not see them not to hear, do not let it bring us closer. Separate, move away from that to which it would need to say no again and again.
"I love you, Serafina. From here you want. We would both so happy here! "
(A year ago that Bean did not write.)
Dr. Guillermo Ballesteros, the coroner, and his collaborators began to realize that the problem of toxicity of human relations was at less meritorious. Agreed on the possibility of creating bubbles of isolation against idiocy. And began to realize how much time they spent in their daily conversations and toxic idiots. Even
Ballesteros came to think as Deligny (Romanian psychiatrist living in Paris) on the relationship between toxicity and mental illness. Bean himself was
references to American Psychiatry in the American yuppies suffering from a new psychological syndrome: the schizoaffective why abruptly stopped feeling emotional world around them, and Bean stated that this flight affective or withdrawal the world was the only chance to escape in time of the robot for which the medium had trained. It was a humanizing withdrawal. Preservation flight to return to the emotional world differently. Inventing. Ingeniando.
No one had the impression of being with someone outside the trial, but a person who was traveling in another dimension, in other possible spaces. Bean is a hero of the micropolitics of resistance. A hero who was conceived by questioning and challenging the postmodern. Bean is the hero who knows how you looked, above all, never lose the ability to move that seems to be their greatest expression of freedom: that which does not plan to deliver in any respect (the escape and resistance in liquid modernity, Ezequiel Gusneroti).
The term "bubble of isolation seems to be, according to Bean, which arose from a suggestion at a meeting held in Paris with Gilles Deleuze, in September 1980, in that conversation, Deleuze Bean had taken that concept. Then
Deleuze modified the word "vacuole" to "bubble", according to disguise the plagiarism Beans. Dr. Ballesteros ignored the great French philosopher and could never prove it. All he could see is that on that date Bean had traveled to Paris.
Serafina, Bean's girlfriend, knew of his trip to Paris, told him to back a French philosopher stole their ideas and so had hastened his return trip.
One day, Bean told the doctor Guillermo Ballesteros sick when we do not make good combinations and we get stuck with people who make sadness or melancholy, and this reduces our power to act. Most people hold these relationships because they lack the awareness to set limits and run of the plant pathology. Break down your body with the other and too sick to stay in these toxic situations that lead to psychosomatic disorders. On the contrary, there are good matches with joyful affects production, which increase the power of acting. Good combinations, Dr. Ballesteros. Should be able to combine well, as you and me.
Horror is sad affects remain manufacturing and lose the ability or power to act. My flight
resistencial micro-mi-is to flee in time of toxicity that affects the body as it decomposes in unhappy relationships.
Everything is a problem of dose-connection relationships, not links or relationships. Flee in time is preserved of idiocy and lack of passion.
But this is not mine: it is pure Spinoza. I suggest you not read because it is very difficult. Dr. Ballesteros
was not offended, he bought the Ethics of Spinoza and did not understand anything. Medical training is too specific to understand this type of theoretical concepts.
Bean is a fictional character. But I found the clinic through the years, his eccentric ideas have at its core raison d'être. Its meaning.
I think many people sick bad because it combines with another person and is prone to get sick to stay with that person for years. Many believe them psychosomatic illnesses attributable to these relationships. People do not think
toxicity that comes between them and can not, according to the philosophy of Bean-flee in time.
I think sometimes lengthy analysis hurting some patients for this reason, creating iatrogenic events (of which little talking).
Recently a 32 year old girl wanted to enter a therapy group and I ask how long it had been addressed in any previous psychotherapy. "I started at 16 years with an analyst, social and sexual inhibitions and still continuing with it." I pointed out that discussions had taken half of his life. "Twice a week," he replied. He said that the early years had been helped by the therapist, but later the ratio had bogged down and could not quit. He did not helped and stayed seven years more, creating a toxic relationship, had developed a great friendship, but creativity does not exist in her or him. "Go to therapy caused me sadness. I did not dare to leave. Why I'm here, I want to be with people and listen to other problems. Share and resonate with other people. "
Bean would have advised" run on time "and leave their extensive analysis because the psychotherapeutic relationship became a toxic relationship and sad where she lost her power of acting. In its early years had achieved good results. Analyzed rather than to live, she lived to be analyzed. I understand that professional
-analysts, psychologists can perform analysis because our profession long requires special training. I analyzed 15 years or more. But people who go to my groups have an average of 15 years of analysis or other previous therapy. Some are accountants, other teachers, employees, employers, far away from the profession psi.
is good to realize that we must learn to "run" time on the toxicity of some relationships that cause us grief and make us lose power to act.
In this case, the flight is a therapeutic act, says Bean.
In our everyday life we \u200b\u200bperceive that there are relationships which give us joy, we become more creative and new passions. And there are other relationships where we do not combine and "think wrong." This sadness. Loss of consciousness of this last link as the production of symptoms is of great importance.
The ability of people to remain in situations "idiots" is immeasurable. The ability of people who do not flee in time for this type of relationship is sometimes inconceivable.
Throughout my life, I have met intelligent people who gradually lost his creativity, power and passion for being linked to toxic relationships.
Bean said that good people is often dangerous because of its toxicity. In my personal case, I have had toxic relationships and have had the opportunity to "run" on time "following his philosophy on many occasions. A Bean was appalled
any type of hermeneutics as possible. He would say things are well and one choice: to stay or flee in time. It is a conscious existential choice.
Something similar to what Foucault said when referring to that, before reaching the unconscious, we must perceive the "dirty little secrets" of people. It is a mindset that invites reflection. Dr. Guillermo Ballesteros
do some work in Argentina Psychiatric Association that was titled "The flight and therapeutic act." But the flight was generally interpreted as defensive phobic and not as an act of preservation.
Bean also criticized the work of Dr. Ballesteros because they considered it inappropriate to discuss it with psychiatrists.
Shortly thereafter, he was invited to France to develop their experience with actors and mathematicians (who are very interested in your theory.) Even today it remains in Greenland with his girlfriend Serafina. He wrote his book in two volumes The flight and existential therapeutic act (which is now in its third edition).

Text published on page 12, May 2007

Sandee Westgate Blowjob

''I want as many people see my pictures so you can not turn and face ignore what happens in the other half of world.''

When Do I Know My Period Is Over

Sebastião Salgado Sebastião Salgado, photographer.

Sebastião Salgado: is a Brazilian photographer born in Aimorés, Minas Gerais, in 1944. He received the 1998 Prince of Asturias Award of Arts

Agency with a Leica M6 and R8 reflex too rarely, always works in 35 mm, with targets 21, 28, 35 and 90 mm, Tri-X film ISO 400 and T-Max 400 ISO. Arriving at forcing in difficult light conditions 800 and 1600 ISO.

How To Protect Front Door From Sun Damage

Does Plain Yogurt Cure Bv

Deleuze and David Cooper

Homemade Advent Wreath

From the moment

Deleuze's book for beginners

Converting A Plug In Light To Hardwire

NOTES



Opening: Monday March 8
. 5:00 pm Auditorium
Jaime Hoyos, Edificio Manuel Briceño SJ

• March 8 to 11 / 5:00 to 8:00 pm Auditorium
Jaime Hoyos, Edificio Manuel Briceño SJ

• March 12 and 15 to 18 / 4: 00 to 8:00 pm Auditorium
Paramo Santiago, Edificio Fernando Baron SJ