Heraclitus has denied the duality of the Worlds, "has denied self. " Moreover, evolution has made a statement. And you have to think for a long time to get to understand what evolution means making a statement. Certainly want to say first: there is only becoming. No doubt the future is to love. But it also affirms the being of becoming, it is said that the development claims to be or that being stated in the future. Heraclitus has two thoughts, which function as figures: one according to which the self is not, everything is becoming, another whereby the being is the being of becoming as such. Laborious thought that says becoming a contemplative thought that affirms the being of becoming. Both thoughts are not separable. Becoming-mad that never stops. The pure becoming, the unlimited, is the subject of the exercise while dodging the action of the Idea, while challenging both the model and copy. Things are measures under the ideas, but in the things themselves, is not there another element that remains insane, which called somewhat out of order imposed by the received ideas and things? Becoming-mad, becoming-unlimited and is not a fund that growls, rises to the surface of things and becomes impassible. It is no longer that escape drills in the background and hints everywhere, but effects that appear and play in his place. Effects in the causal sense, but "effects" sound, optical or language; or even less, or much more, as it has nothing to corporal and are now the whole idea ... What shirk the idea has risen to the surface, limit intangible, and now represents all possible ideal, now destitute of causal efficacy and spiritual. The Stoics have found surface effects. The drills are no longer the rebels underground assert their effects. Hidden as it has become more evident. The event is coextensive with becoming, and becoming the same, coextensive with the language.
0 comments:
Post a Comment