Thursday, March 24, 2011

Back Leg Twitch In Dogs

Things between things


We plant trees on their heads: the life, knowledge, etc. Everyone claims roots. Power is always tree. Almost all disciplines go through schemes arborescence: biology, computer science, linguistics (the controllers or systems centered). The tree is not a metaphor, is a device that is planted in the mind, an operation to make him go in the right direction, that of the right ideas. In the tree there are all sorts of characters there is a point of origin, origin or center, is a binary machine or principle of dichotomy with its branches spread and reproduced in perpetuity, their points of arborescence, axis of rotation organized around the center circle and things in circles, it's structure, hierarchical system of transmission of orders, with central and memory recapitulated instance, there is a future past, a root and a drink, a history, an evolution, development or development time. But there are multitudes that continue to overwhelm the machinery binary and who refuse to divorce. Haycentros everywhere as black holes which can not be agglomerated. Lines that have nothing to do with the trajectory of a point and that escape from the structure. Drain lines, transformations, becomings no future and no past, no memory. No parallel developments do not proceed by differentiation, but that jump from one line to another human to completely heterogeneous. This is the Rhizome . Thinking about things between things that is making rhizome and root not, draw the line and not stop to recapitulate. Create a desert population and gender rather than species in a forest.

Fake Id London Ontario

Jean Dubuffet, Jean Dubuffet


virtual Surge (1963)
Oil on canvas. 220 x 190 cm.
Location: Centre Georges Pompidou. Paris

Garden Company Slogans

virtual (1901-1985) writing



Four trees
1972 (71 years)
Material: polyurethane epoxy paint.
Size: 12 m.
Museum: Chase Manhattan Plaza. New York


Monday, March 21, 2011

English To Tamil Poetry

Becoming Becoming


The writing is inseparable from the becoming; writing, it becomes-woman, becomes-animal or vegetable, becomes-molecule to becoming-imperceptible. The evolution does not work the other way, and no man becomes, while the man is presented as a dominant form of expression intended to be imposed on any matter, while women, animal or molecule always contain a component of leakage that subtracted from its own conclusion. The shame of being a man, is there any better reason to write? Even when a woman who becomes, it has a becoming-woman, and this evolution has nothing to do with a state she could claim. Becoming no is to achieve a form (identification, imitation, Mimesis), but to find the neighborhood of indiscernibility or differentiation that no longer fit unamujer distinguished from unanimal or unamolécula: not vague or general, but unforeseen, no pre-existing the less certain in a way as to single out in a population.